MAH MBA CET Exam Analysis 2026: MAH MBA CET 2026 first session exam was held on April 6, 7 and 8 in five shifts. MAH MBA CET 2026 exam analysis reveals that all papers were broadly rated easy to moderate, but lengthy. Logical Reasoning section emerged as the biggest challenge due to lengthiness rather than conceptual difficulty. Quantitative Aptitude stayed arithmetic-dominated with 2 DI sets per slot, where TSD, Time & Work, and Profit & Loss together contributed the bulk of questions. Abstract Reasoning and VARC offered strong scoring opportunities with cutoffs are likely to settle on the higher side. MAH MBA CET 2026 second session will be conducted on May 9. Candidates taking second attempt should focus on revising important topics that appeared in the first session and fine tuning their test taking strategy. Read complete MAH MBA CET Slot 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 exam analysis in the article with inputs from The Top Percentile experts.
Live Now: MAH MBA CET Score Vs Percentile 2026 estimates suggest that Score of 125-130 marks should get 99 percentile. MAH MBA CET 2026 Percentile Calculator is live. Calculate your score and percentile now. Also check MAH MBA CET Cut Offs 2026 for JBIMS and other top MBA colleges.
MAH MBA CET Slot 1 Analysis: MAH MBA CET slot 1 exam was held on April 6 from 9.00 AM to 11.30 AM. The MAH MBA CET 2026 Day 1 Slot 1 was rated as easy to moderate difficulty level paper by the students. Paper was not conceptually difficult, but it was lengthy, particularly in Logical Reasoning and Quantitative Aptitude. There was no change in exam patter with 200 questions to be attempted in 150 minutes and no negative marking. Based on student feedback and expert analysis, this slot is expected to witness a higher cutoff compared to last year. MBAUniverse.com presents complete MAH MBA CET 2026 exam analysis by The Top Percentile experts.
| Section | No. of Questions | Difficulty Level |
|---|---|---|
| Logical Reasoning | 75 | Easy but Lengthy |
| Abstract Reasoning | 25 | Easy |
| Quantitative Aptitude | 50 | Easy to Moderate |
| VARC | 50 | Easy to Moderate |
| Total | 200 | Easy but Lengthy |
Key Highlights:
Slot 1 of MAH MBA CET 2026 was a speed-driven paper with low conceptual difficulty but high time pressure.
Abstract Reasoning and VARC offered strong scoring opportunities.
Quant and Logical Reasoning required smart question selection to avoid time traps.
The shift in Logical Reasoning towards singlet-based questions was a major change.
- Given the nature of the paper and consistent student feedback, the cutoff for this slot is expected to be on the higher side.
- The paper was easy overall but time-consuming, particularly in LR and Quant
- Logical Reasoning had almost entirely individual questions, with no traditional puzzles
- Quant was calculation-intensive, with multiple questions involving decimals
- Abstract Reasoning was dominated by figure counting and series-based questions
- VARC was largely scoring, with a strong emphasis on grammar and vocabulary
MAH MBA CET 2026 Analysis: Day 1 Slot 1 Section-wise Highlights
Verbal Ability and Reading Comprehension (VARC):
The VARC section was easy to moderate, with a clear tilt towards vocabulary and grammar-based questions. There were 5 Reading Comprehension passages contributing 20 questions. The passages were of moderate length and covered a mix of contemporary and general topics:
- Women Empowerment
- Cybercrime
- Tariffs
- Electric Vehicles (EVs)
- One additional general topic passage
Most RC questions were direct and detail-based, although a few required inference. Some students reported that at least one RC was difficult to attempt within time.
The remaining 30 questions were from Verbal Ability, making this a scoring section for students with strong basics.
Type of Questions in VARC Section
| Topic | No. of Questions |
|---|---|
| Reading Comprehension (5 passages) | 20 |
| Vocabulary | 7 |
| Grammar | 10 |
| Fill in the blanks | 7 |
| Para Jumbles | 1 |
| Idioms & Phrases | 5 |
| Total | 50 |
The grammar questions included error spotting, active-passive voice, direct-indirect speech, sentence correction, and sentence completion.
Overall, students found this section manageable and scoring, with high accuracy possible in VA.
Quantitative Aptitude:
The Quant section was easy to moderate, but calculation-intensive, making it time-consuming.
A significant number of questions involved decimals and multi-step calculations, which slowed down attempts despite the underlying concepts being straightforward.
Type of Questions in Quant Section
| Topic | No. of Questions |
|---|---|
| Numbers | 1 |
| Time-Speed-Distance | 7 |
| Time & Work | 5 |
| Profit & Loss | 7 |
| Geometry | 3 |
| Mixture & Allegation | 2 |
| Progressions | 1 |
| Probability | 1 |
| Percentages | 3 |
| Averages | 2 |
| Data Interpretation | 10 |
| HCF & LCM | 2 |
| Ages | 2 |
| Divisibility | 1 |
| Simplification | 1 |
| Total | 50 |
The section was dominated by Arithmetic, with minimal presence of Algebra.
Many students reported around 30–35 genuine attempts, indicating that while the section was doable, time management played a key role.
Logical Reasoning:
Logical Reasoning was easy in terms of difficulty, but structurally very different from typical CET papers.
The most notable deviation was the absence of traditional puzzles, with nearly all questions being standalone.
Type of Questions in LR Section
| Topic | No. of Questions |
|---|---|
| Arrangements & Ranking | 13 |
| Coding-Decoding | 4 |
| Number Series | 8 |
| Syllogisms | 5 |
| Word Sequence | 5 |
| Blood Relations | 5 |
| Calculation Techniques & Mathematical Reasoning | 8 |
| Odd One Out | 5 |
| Directions | 5 |
| Venn Diagrams | 3 |
| Input-Output | 5 |
| Miscellaneous (TSD, PnC, Probability, Divisibility, Counting Figures) | Multiple |
| Total | 75 |
Only one puzzle-type set was reported. Several questions belonged to Quant-type reasoning, including Time-Speed-Distance, Probability, and Divisibility.
Many questions were direct, with options that could be eliminated quickly. However, the section was lengthy and required strong time management.
Abstract Reasoning:
Abstract Reasoning was easy and highly scoring, although a few questions were slightly ambiguous.
The section was dominated by figure-based and visual reasoning questions.
Type of Questions in Abstract Reasoning Section
| Topic | No. of Questions |
|---|---|
| Series | 8 |
| Figure Counting | 8 |
| Pattern Comparison | 5 |
| Paper Folding | 2 |
| Analogy | 1 |
| Cube/Dice | 1 |
| Total | 25 |
While most questions were straightforward, 3–4 questions were reported to be slightly confusing, particularly in figure counting.
Expected Score vs Percentile (Slot 1):
Based on Slot 1 difficulty and historical CET trends, the MAH MBA CET Marks vs Percentile estimates are:
| Percentile | Score (Approx) |
|---|---|
| 99.9 | 153–158 |
| 99.5 | 130–132 |
| 99 | 122–124 |
| 95 | 103–105 |
| 90 | 96–98 |
| 85 | 90–92 |
| 80 | 85–87 |
| 75 | 80–82 |
| 70 | 75–77 |
| 65 | 70–72 |
| 60 | 65–67 |
MAH MBA CET Slot 2 Analysis: MAH MBA CET slot 2 exam was held on April 6 from 2.00 PM to 4.30 PM. Slot 2 of MAH MBA CET 2026 exam paper was very similar to Slot 1, contrary to the usual trend where Slot 2 tends to be more difficult. Overall difficulty level of Day 1 Slot 2 was easy to moderate, like slot 1. Based on multiple student interactions and initial feedback, this slot was arguably one of the easiest in recent years, with most sections being straightforward but slightly lengthy due to the number of questions and calculations involved. The paper continued to follow the MAH MBA CET pattern of 200 questions in 150 minutes with no negative marking.
MAH MBA CET 2026 Exam Analysis: Day 1 Slot 1 Overview
| Section | No. of Questions | Difficulty Level |
|---|---|---|
| Logical Reasoning | 75 | Easy but Lengthy |
| Abstract Reasoning | 25 | Easy |
| Quantitative Aptitude | 50 | Easy |
| VARC | 50 | Easy to Moderate |
| Total | 200 | Easy but Lengthy |
Key Highlights
- Slot 2 was very similar to Slot 1 in pattern and difficulty
- No puzzles in Logical Reasoning, almost all questions were standalone
- Quant was direct and formula-based, with minimal conceptual difficulty
- Abstract Reasoning had a large number of PYQ-type questions
- VARC was scoring, with straightforward RCs and grammar
- Many students reported 170–180 genuine attempts
MAH MBA CET 2026 Exam Analysis: Day 1 Slot 1 Section-wise Highlights
Verbal Ability and Reading Comprehension (VARC):
The VARC section was easy to moderate and largely scoring.
There were 4 Reading Comprehension passages contributing 20 questions. The passages were based on:
- Mahatma Gandhi
- Online Banking
- Metals and Paper Money
- Higher Education
The RCs were mostly direct. One passage, particularly on Mahatma Gandhi, was slightly difficult, while the others were straightforward. The Verbal Ability section focused on vocabulary, grammar, and sentence-based questions.
Type of Questions in VARC Section
| Topic | No. of Questions |
|---|---|
| Reading Comprehension (4 passages) | 20 |
| Para Jumbles (separate statements) | 5–6 |
| Error Spotting | 4–5 |
| Synonyms & Antonyms | 4–5 |
| Grammatically Correct Sentence | 3–4 |
| Vocabulary & Idioms | Few |
| Total | 50 |
Students reported high attempts with strong accuracy in this section.
Quantitative Aptitude:
The Quant section was easy and largely one-liner based, making it highly scoring.
Most questions were direct applications of formulas.
Type of Questions in Quant Section
| Topic | No. of Questions |
|---|---|
| Data Interpretation (2 sets) | 10 |
| Time & Work | 2–3 |
| Pipes & Cisterns | 2–3 |
| Profit & Loss / Investment | 2–3 |
| Time-Speed-Distance | 4–5 |
| Trains | 1–2 |
| Simple & Compound Interest | 2–3 |
| Percentage | 1–2 |
| Coins / Value | 1 |
| Total | 50 |
The DI sets were very easy and manageable.
Logical Reasoning:
Logical Reasoning was easy but unconventional.
There were no puzzles, and all questions were standalone.
Type of Questions in Logical Reasoning Section
| Topic | No. of Questions |
|---|---|
| Number Series | 4–5 |
| Alpha-Numeric Series | 3–4 |
| Coding-Decoding | 4–5 |
| Word Arrangement & Formation | 5–6 |
| Directions | 3–4 |
| Blood Relations | 3–4 |
| Input-Output (individual) | 4–5 |
| Venn Diagrams | 5–6 |
| Probability | 2–3 |
| Syllogisms | 2–3 |
| Inequality | 2–3 |
| Linear Arrangement | 3–4 |
| Ranking | 3 |
| Logical Order | 2 |
| Total | 75 |
The section was easy but lengthy, requiring strong time management.
Abstract Reasoning:
Abstract Reasoning was easy and highly scoring.
Type of Questions in Abstract Reasoning Section
| Topic | No. of Questions |
|---|---|
| Series | 8 |
| Figure Counting | 5–6 |
| Water Image | 3–4 |
| Pattern Comparison | Few |
| Paper Folding | 2 |
| Cube / Dice | 1 |
| Missing Figure / Number | 2–3 |
| Total | 25 |
Most students attempted almost all questions in this section.
Expected Score vs Percentile (Slot 2)
Based on the difficulty level and similarity with Slot 1, the MAH MBA CET Marks vs percentile is expected to remain on the higher side:
| Percentile | Score (Approx) |
|---|---|
| 99.9 | 153–158 |
| 99.5 | 130–132 |
| 99 | 122–124 |
| 95 | 103–105 |
| 90 | 96–98 |
| 85 | 90–92 |
| 80 | 85–87 |
| 75 | 80–82 |
| 70 | 75–77 |
| 65 | 70–72 |
| 60 | 65–67 |
MAH MBA CET Slot 3 Analysis: MAH MBA CET slot 3 exam was held on April 7 from 9.00 AM to 11.30 AM. Slot 3 of MAH MBA CET 2026 continued the pattern set by earlier slots, offering a paper that was broadly easy to moderate in difficulty but demanding in terms of time management. Logical Reasoning was the defining section of this slot not due to high difficulty, but because of the sheer length of individual questions. Some singlets were verbose & once again there were no traditionally asked puzzles of 5 questions each, slowing down even well prepared students. Abstract Reasoning, by contrast, was one of the most scoring sections of the day, with the majority of questions being straightforward and several drawn directly from previous years’ papers. Read complete MAH MBA CET Slot 3 Analysis.
Overview
Section | No. of Questions | Difficulty Level |
|---|---|---|
Logical Reasoning | 75 | Easy (Lengthy Singlets) |
Abstract Reasoning | 25 | Very Easy |
Quantitative Aptitude | 50 | Easy to Moderate |
VARC | 50 | Easy to Moderate |
Total | 200 | Easy but Lengthy |
Section-wise Analysis
Verbal Ability and Reading Comprehension (VARC)
VARC in Slot 3 was easy to moderate. The section featured 4 Reading Comprehension passages. Three of the four passages were rated easy to moderate, with direct and inference based questions. One passage was difficult and time consuming. The remaining questions in VARC covered vocabulary and grammar, both rated easy to easy - moderate respectively.
Topic | LOD |
|---|---|
Reading Comprehension (4 passages) | 3 - Easy to Moderate , 1 Hard |
Vocabulary | Easy to Moderate |
Grammar | Easy |
Overall | Easy to Moderate |
Quantitative Aptitude & Data Interpretation
The Quant section in Slot 3 was rated easy to moderate, with a structure broadly similar to other slots. The section had two Data Interpretation sets of 5 marks each, consistent with previous slots. 1 set was easy to moderate & other was moderate to difficult, and students who attempted them with care reported good accuracy. The remaining questions were spread across standard arithmetic topics Time, Speed and Distance, Time and Work, Profit and Loss, Mixture & Allegations and other related topics. Students who prioritised the arithmetic questions and used the DI sets strategically were able to achieve good attempt counts.
Topic | LOD |
|---|---|
Data Interpretation (2 sets, 5 marks each) | 1 - Easy to Moderate , 1 Hard |
Time, Speed & Distance | Easy to Moderate |
Time & Work | Moderate |
Profit & Loss | Easy to Moderate |
Other Arithmetic Topics | Easy to Moderate |
Overall | Easy to Moderate |
Logical Reasoning
Logical Reasoning was the most time-intensive section of Slot 3 and the key differentiator between high scorers and average scorers. While the section was not difficult in terms of concepts, the questions were lengthy and verbose, with singlets that required significantly more reading time than in past years. Of the 75 questions, approximately 50 were standalone singlets individually solvable, but each demanded careful reading. Critical Reasoning accounted for around 10 questions, ranging from easy to moderate. The section also had 3 puzzle type questions worth 2 marks each, a relatively lower puzzle presence compared to previous year papers.
Topic | No. of Questions | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|
Singlets (Individual Questions) | ~50 | Easy (Lengthy) |
Critical Reasoning | ~10 | Easy to Moderate |
Puzzles / Sets | 3 (2 marks each) | Easy |
Total | 75 |
|
Abstract Reasoning
Abstract Reasoning was the highlight of Slot 3 in terms of ease and scoring potential. The section was rated very easy by the majority of students, with most questions being immediately solvable. Series-based questions including odd one out, missing figure, and next-in-series formed a significant portion of the section, with 3 - 4 questions reported to be direct PYQs.
Topic | No. of Questions | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|
Series (Odd One Out / Missing / Next) | ~3–4 (PYQs) | Easy |
Counting Figures | 3 | Moderate to Difficult |
MAH MBA CET Slot 4 Analysis: MAH MBA CET slot 4 exam was held on April 7 from 2.00 PM to 4.30 PM. Slot 4 of MAH MBA CET 2026 continued the trend seen in earlier slots, with the paper being rated easy to moderate overall. While the difficulty level remained manageable, the paper was lengthy in parts, particularly in Logical Reasoning, making time management crucial. Read complete MAH MBA CET Slot 4 Analysis.
Overview:
| Section | No. of Questions | Difficulty Level |
|---|---|---|
| Logical Reasoning | 75 | Easy but Lengthy |
| Abstract Reasoning | 25 | Easy |
| Quantitative Aptitude | 50 | Easy to Moderate |
| VARC | 50 | Easy |
| Total | 200 | Easy to Moderate |
Verbal Ability and Reading Comprehension (VARC):
The VARC section was easy and scoring. There were 4 Reading Comprehension passages with 5 questions each, accounting for 20 questions. The RCs were relatively straightforward and could often be answered through skimming rather than detailed reading. The Verbal Ability section had a strong focus on vocabulary and grammar.
| Topic | No. of Questions |
|---|---|
| Reading Comprehension (4 passages) | 20 |
| Vocabulary (Synonyms, Antonyms, Idioms) | 16–18 |
| Grammar (Error, Sentence Correction, Active-Passive, Direct-Indirect) | 12–14 |
| Para Jumbles / Sentence Arrangement | 2–3 |
| Total | 50 |
Quantitative Aptitude:
The Quant section was easy to moderate, with most questions being direct and formula-based. There was a balanced mix of Arithmetic and Data Interpretation, along with a noticeable presence of Data Sufficiency questions.
| Topic | No. of Questions |
|---|---|
| Data Interpretation (Bar Graph & Pie Chart) | 10 |
| Data Sufficiency | 6–8 |
| Profit & Loss | 5–6 |
| Time & Work | 4–5 |
| Time-Speed-Distance | 4–5 |
| Pipes & Cisterns | 2–3 |
| Averages | 3–4 |
| Squares & Cubes | 4–5 |
| Simple & Compound Interest | 2 |
| Probability | 1–2 |
| Ages | 2–3 |
| Total | 50 |
Logical Reasoning:
Logical Reasoning was easy in terms of concepts but lengthy due to the number of questions and variety of topics. The section consisted mostly of singlet questions, with 1–2 small sets of 2–3 questions each.
| Topic | No. of Questions |
|---|---|
| Number Series / Pattern | 6–7 |
| Coding-Decoding | 6–8 |
| Data Sufficiency | 4–5 |
| Directions | 4–5 |
| Blood Relations | 4–5 |
| Word Formation / Rearrangement | 5–6 |
| Alphabet-based Questions | 2–3 |
| Arrangements (Linear & Circular) | 6–8 |
| PnC / Counting Logic | 2–3 |
| Miscellaneous Singlets | 18–22 |
| Total | 75 |
Abstract Reasoning:
Abstract Reasoning was easy and highly scoring. The section included a mix of series, odd one out, figure counting, and pattern-based questions. Most questions were straightforward and similar to previous years, allowing students to attempt almost the entire section comfortably.
MAH MBA CET Slot 5 Analysis: MAH MBA CET slot 5 exam was held on April 8 from 9.00 AM to 11.30 AM. Slot 5 of MAH MBA CET 2026 marked a slight shift from the earlier slots, with the paper being rated moderate overall. While some sections remained straightforward, others, particularly Logical Reasoning, demanded more time and careful reading. Unlike Slot 1, 2, and 4, this slot introduced a slightly higher level of variation in question types. Overall, the paper continued to be speed-driven, but with a noticeable increase in time pressure in LR and QA. Read complete MAH MBA CET Slot 5 Analysis.
Overall Snapshot
| Section | No. of Questions | Difficulty Level |
|---|---|---|
| Logical Reasoning | 75 | Moderate |
| Abstract Reasoning | 25 | Easy |
| Quantitative Aptitude | 50 | Easy to Moderate |
| VARC | 50 | Moderate |
| Total | 200 | Moderate |
Verbal Ability and Reading Comprehension (VARC)
The VARC section was moderate, with a slight increase in difficulty compared to earlier slots.
There were 4 RC passages with 5 questions each (20 questions total). Two RCs were reported to be easy, while one required more careful reading, especially for tone-based questions. The Verbal Ability section included a mix of grammar, vocabulary, and sentence-based questions.
| Topic | No. of Questions |
|---|---|
| Reading Comprehension (4 passages) | 20 |
| Vocabulary | 5–6 |
| Fill in the Blanks | 5 |
| Statements & Assumptions | 5 |
| Error Detection | 4 |
| Sentence Correction | 3 |
| Para Completion | 3 |
| Para Jumbles | 1 |
| Active-Passive | 1 |
| Direct-Indirect Speech | 1 |
| Correct Usage | 2 |
| Total | 50 |
Quantitative Aptitude
The Quant section was easy to moderate, but relatively lengthy due to calculations. Arithmetic dominated the section, with very limited presence of higher math topics. DI sets were straightforward, but overall the section became time-consuming due to multiple calculation steps.
| Topic | No. of Questions |
|---|---|
| Data Interpretation (Pie + Table) | 10 |
| Time-Speed-Distance | 5 |
| Number Series | 4 |
| Percentages | 4 |
| Probability / PnC | 3 |
| Mensuration | 3 |
| Profit & Loss | 3 |
| Miscellaneous Arithmetic | 5 |
| HCF | 1 |
| Pipes & Cisterns | 1 |
| Time & Work | 1 |
| Simple & Compound Interest | 2 |
| Divisibility | 1 |
| Mixtures | 1 |
| BODMAS | 2 |
| Ages | 1 |
| Total | 50 |
Logical Reasoning
Logical Reasoning was the most challenging section in this slot, primarily due to its length and variety. Unlike earlier slots, this section included:
- 2 puzzle-based questions
- Presence of Critical Reasoning (Assertion-based)
- A mix of both traditional and CET-style singlets
- Majority of questions were still singlets
- Presence of Critical Reasoning (5–6 questions) was a deviation
- Puzzle questions were limited but time-consuming
- Input-output questions required careful tracking
| Topic | No. of Questions |
|---|---|
| Number Series | 6 |
| Divisibility | 2 |
| Input-Output | 5 |
| Data Sufficiency | 5 |
| Venn Diagrams | 5 |
| Meaningful Arrangement | 5 |
| Linear Arrangement | 6 |
| PnC / Probability | 3 |
| Directions | 5 |
| Analogy | 4 |
| Blood Relations | 5 |
| BODMAS / Calculation Logic | 4 |
| Puzzle-based Questions | 2 |
| Calendar | 1 |
| DI-based LR | 5 |
| Miscellaneous | 12–15 |
| Total | 75 |
Abstract Reasoning
Abstract Reasoning remained easy and scoring, consistent with earlier slots.
Distribution
- Analogy-based questions dominated (around 13 questions)
- Missing figures, odd one out, and series-based questions were present
- Pattern-based continuation questions were straightforward
Most students were able to attempt 23–25 questions comfortably.
MAH MBA CET Slot 6 Analysis: MAH MBA CET slot 6 exam will be held on May 9, 2026. A detailed analysis will be published soon after the exam.
Looking for MAH MBA CET 2026 Analysis PDF free download? You can download MAH MBA CET Exam Analysis 2026 PDF document from the link given below. MAH MBA CET Exam Analysis 2026 PDF download contains complete exam paper analysis that is given on this page. You can refer to it anytime. MAH MBA CET Exam Analysis 2026 free download will certainly help you to improve your exam score and percentile.
Based on the MAH MBA CET 2026 exam analysis of Slot 1 and Slot 2, this year’s paper has followed a consistent and student-friendly pattern so far, with low conceptual difficulty but high emphasis on speed and selection. Candidates appearing in Day 2 and 3 slots must aim to maximize attempts without getting stuck. Questions are mainly direct, and in many cases, 2–3 options can be eliminated quickly. This makes intelligent guessing and elimination an important skill. Read Strategy and Tips for Upcoming Slots on Day 2 & Day 3 based on Day 1 exam pattern analysis by Aditya Sridhar, 99.99 percentile scorer in MAH MBA CET, a JBIMS graduate, and co-founder of The Top Percentile.
Based on the analysis of Slot 1 and Slot 2, the MAH MBA CET 2026 paper has followed a consistent and student-friendly pattern so far, with low conceptual difficulty but high emphasis on speed and selection. Candidates appearing in the upcoming slots should focus less on difficulty expectations and more on execution strategy inside the exam hall.
Focus on Attempt Maximization, Not Perfection
Across both slots, the paper has been easy to moderate, which means that cutoffs are likely to be high. In such a scenario, accuracy alone is not enough. Students must aim to maximize attempts without getting stuck. Questions are mainly direct, and in many cases, 2–3 options can be eliminated quickly. This makes intelligent guessing and elimination an important skill.
Logical Reasoning: Prioritize Speed over Depth
Logical Reasoning has shifted significantly from traditional CET patterns.
- Majority of questions are standalone (singlets)
- Very few or no traditional puzzles
- Some slots may include small puzzle sets with limited marks
Students should:
- Avoid spending excessive time on any single question
- Be cautious with Input-Output and calculation-heavy reasoning questions, as they can consume disproportionate time
- Quickly move across questions and focus on high-speed solving
This section is no longer about solving complex sets but about maintaining pace across 75 questions.
Quantitative Aptitude: Avoid Calculation Traps
Quant has been easy to moderate but time-consuming due to calculations, especially in Arithmetic.
- Expect 2 DI sets (5 questions each)
- Majority of questions are one-liner and formula-based
Students should:
- Prioritize direct and shorter questions first
- Skip lengthy decimal or multi-step calculations in the first pass
- Use approximation wherever possible
The key is not solving everything, but avoiding low-return questions.
VARC: High-Scoring but Selection Matters
VARC has remained relatively stable across slots:
- 4 RCs with 20 questions
- Strong focus on vocabulary and grammar
While the section is scoring, students should:
- Quickly scan RCs and attempt the easier passages first
- Avoid spending too much time on a single difficult RC
- Maximize marks through vocabulary and grammar questions, which are quicker to solve
This section can significantly boost overall score if handled efficiently.
Abstract Reasoning: Do Not Leave Easy Marks
Abstract Reasoning continues to be the most scoring section.
- Heavy presence of series, figure counting, and pattern-based questions
- Several questions are similar to previous years
Students should:
- Aim to attempt almost all questions
- Be cautious only with ambiguous figure-counting questions
This section can be completed quickly and should ideally be used to build momentum early in the paper.
Time Management is the Deciding Factor:
Based on both slots, a balanced time allocation strategy would be:
- Abstract Reasoning: 15–20 minutes
- VARC: 25–30 minutes
- Quantitative Aptitude: 40–50 minutes
- Logical Reasoning: 50–60 minutes
Students should remain flexible and adjust based on paper difficulty, but the overall goal should be to ensure coverage of all sections without getting stuck.
Final Takeaway for Upcoming Slots:
The MAH MBA CET 2026 paper so far has been less about difficulty and more about speed, stamina, and decision-making.
- Do not expect drastic difficulty spikes, but remain prepared for minor variations
- Focus on question selection rather than solving everything
- Maintain composure and avoid overthinking
Students who can stay calm and execute a high-attempt, high-efficiency strategy are likely to perform the best in the upcoming slots.
MAH MBA CET Exam Dates are April 6, 7, and 8, 2026 (1st Attempt).
Exam Date | Slot | Timing |
|---|---|---|
April 6 | Slot 1 | 9:00 pm to 11:30 pm |
| Slot 2 | 2.00 PM to 4.30 PM |
April 7 | Slot 1 | 9:00 pm to 11:30 pm |
| Slot 2 | 2.00 PM to 4.30 PM |
April 8 | Slot 1 | 9:00 pm to 11:30 pm |
| Slot 2 | 2.00 PM to 4.30 PM |
Check MAH MBA CET Exam Date and Timing including reporting time.
Read MAH MBA CET Day 1 Exam Analysis for Slot 1 (9.00-11.30 AM).
- The MAH MBA CET 2025 exam pattern saw no changes in the exam pattern with total 200 questions across four key sections.
- The Logical Reasoning section had the highest weightage with 75 questions.
- Both Quantitative Aptitude and Verbal Ability & Reading Comprehension (VARC) featured 50 questions each.
- The Abstract Reasoning section comprised of 25 questions.
- MAH MBA CET 2025 Day 1 Slot 1 paper was Lengthy and difficulty level was Moderate.
- Based on Day 1, Slot 1 paper, MAHCET Score Vs Percentile estimates are that a Score of 130 marks will get 99%.
MAH MBA CET 2025 Exam Pattern
The MAH MBA CET 2025 exam pattern saw no changes in the exam pattern with total 200 questions across four key sections. Check exam pattern below.
Area | Questions |
|---|---|
Quantitative Aptitude | 50 |
Logical Reasoning | 75 |
VARC | 50 |
Abstract Reasoning | 25 |
Total | 200 |
MAH MBA CET 2025 Exam Day 1 Slot 1 Difficulty Level
Area | Questions | LOD | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|
Quantitative Aptitude | 50 | Easy | Large number of questions from Arithmetic |
Logical Reasoning | 75 | Moderate | No Critical Reasoning questions. A few Math Application based Qs also included in this section! |
VARC | 50 | Moderate | There were 20 Reading Comprehension Questions spread across 9 RC passages. Standard Verbal question made up read of the section. |
Abstract Reasoning | 25 | Easy | Standard questions included Counting and Venn Diagram related questions. |
MAH MBA CET 2025 Exam Day 1 Slot 1 Marking Scheme
There was no change in MAH CET marking scheme.
- One mark for the correct attempt
- Zero mark for incorrect attempt and unattempted question
- No negative marking
Section wise Analysis of MAH MBA CET 2025 Exam Paper
Read the detailed section wise analysis including type of questions in this article below.
a) Verbal Ability and Reading Comprehension Section Analysis
The verbal ability section of test consisted of 50 questions with 20 RC questions and 30 VA questions. There were 9 Reading Comprehension passages ranging from around 250 words to 500 words in length. 5 of the passages were accompanied by only one question each, and some of these questions were difficult to answer. The Verbal Ability section was dominated by relatively easy vocabulary questions. Following is the break-up of this section:
Reading Comprehension Section Analysis
| RC Passage Topic | Word Length | No of Questions |
|---|---|---|
| Installation of smoke detectors | 200 words | 5 Qs |
| Shaw and his works | 410 words | 3 Qs |
| Racial kinship | 550 words | 3 Qs |
| Multitasking | 350 words | 1 Q |
| Role of textbooks in education | 250 words | 1 Q |
| Practitioners of fraudulent medicine | 450 words | 4 Qs |
| Satisfaction guarantees in services | 200 words | 1 Q |
| Travel literature | 530 words | 1 Q |
| Grammar in English language | 450 words | 1 Q |
| Total | 20 Qs |
Verbal Ability Section Analysis
| Topics | No of Questions |
|---|---|
| Synonyms + Antonyms | 9 |
| Fill in the blanks (2-blanks) | 2 |
| One-word substitution | 3 |
| Spellings | 5 |
| Idioms | 3 |
| Select the grammatically correct sentence | 1 |
| Odd one out | 1 |
| Jumbled Paragraph (5 statements) | 5 |
| Miscellaneous | 1 |
| Total | 50 |
b) Quantitative Aptitude
There were 50 questions in the Quantitative Aptitude section. The level of difficulty of the questions was easy. Majority of the questions were on Arithmetic, Numbers, Modern Mathematics, Data Sufficiency and Geometry. Check detailed break-up of this section:
| Topics | No of Questions |
|---|---|
| Number System | 11 |
| Arithmetic | 14 |
| Algebra | 3 |
| Geometry | 8 |
| Modern Maths | 5 |
| DI - Tables | One set of 2 questions and one set of 3 questions |
| DI - Pie charts | 3 |
| DI - Other | 1 |
| Total | 50 |
c) Logical Reasoning
There were around 75 questions in the Logical Reasoning section. Check detailed break up of this section below.
| Topics | No of Questions |
|---|---|
| Arrangements | 6 |
| Grouping & Conditionalities | 24 |
| Coding Decoding | 6 |
| Coding Decoding | 6 |
| Family Tree | 7 |
| Number Series | 6 |
| Clocks and Calendars | 3 |
| QA based Reasoning | 2 |
| Miscellaneous | 13 |
| Data Sufficiency | 1 |
| Syllogisms | 1 |
| Total | 75 |
d) Abstract Reasoning
There were 25 questions on Abstract Reasoning. Check the break-up of questions in this section:
| Topics | No of Questions |
|---|---|
| Series Completion | 9 |
| Mirror Image | 1 |
| No of triangle, squares | 3 |
| Figure based numerical puzzles | 2 |
| Paper cutting | 3 |
| Missing part of Master figure | 2 |
| Miscellaneous | 5 |
| Total | 25 |
MAH MBA CET 2025 Analysis for Day 2 reveals that it was a well balanced paper, and slightly easier than Day 1. Check detailed analysis below.
MAH MBA CET 2025 Analysis: Day 2 - Slot 1 Analysis
- Exam Structure was same as Day 1.
- Duration was same as Day 1 - 150 minutes, 200 questions.
- Difficulty Level: Overall, the paper was easy to moderate, making it easier than Day 1.
Section | Number of Questions | Level of Difficulty (LOD) | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|
Quantitative Aptitude | 50 | Moderate | 2 Data Interpretation (DI) sets (~8 questions), standard quant spread |
Logical Reasoning | 75 | Easy-Moderate | 5 Caselets (20 questions), no Critical Reasoning (CR), a few math application-based questions |
VARC (Verbal Ability & Reading Comprehension) | 50 | Easy-Moderate | 12 Reading Comprehension (RC) questions (4 RCs), standard verbal section |
Abstract Reasoning | 25 | Easy-Moderate | Standard abstract reasoning questions |
Total | 200 | Easy-Moderate | Overall, the exam was easier compared to Day 1 |
MAH MBA CET 2025 Analysis for Day 3 reveals that the paper was moderate. Check detailed analysis below.
MAH MBA CET 2025 Analysis: Day 3 - Slot 2 Analysis
- Exam Structure was same as Day 1.
- Duration was same as Day 1 - 150 minutes, 200 questions.
- Difficulty Level: Overall, the paper was easy to moderate.
Area | Number of Questions | Level of Difficulty | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|
Quantitative Aptitude | 50 | Moderate | Algebra, Numbers, Arithmetic; Calculation intensive |
Logical Reasoning | 75 | Moderate | 4-5 Caselets – 20 Qs, some interesting Qs + errors |
VARC | 50 | Easy-Moderate | 20 RC Qs (5+ RCs), Lot of grammar + vocab |
Abstract Reasoning | 25 | Easy | Easy except a few questions |
Total | 200 | Moderate |
MAH CET Paper Analysis for previous years 2024 with complete details on exam pattern, difficulty level, cut off is given below:
MAH MBA CET 2024 Slot 1 Analysis
Date : 9th March 2024 (Saturday)
Slot : 10:00 pm to 12:30 pm
Total Number of Questions : 200
Total Time allotted : 150 minutes
No. of Choices per question : 5 choices
No. of Sections : 4 sections
Negative Marks : No negative marking
MAH MBA CET 2024 Paper Pattern
Area | No. of Questions | |
|---|---|---|
1 | Logical Reasoning | 75 |
2 | Verbal Usage & Reading Comprehension | 50 |
3 | Quantitative Aptitude | 50 |
4 | Abstract Reasoning | 25 |
Total | 200 |
Area 1: Logical Reasoning
Majority of the questions in the section were reported to be of easy to moderate difficulty. There were three set-based questions. One Linear Arrangement puzzle (5 Qs), one set on blood relations (5 Qs), and one Venn Diagram set (3 Qs). According to the students, the puzzles was not lengthy and fairly easy to answer. There is one set on Venn Diagrams which is easy to answer. There were no critical reasoning questions to the relief of the students. The section has 10 questions on blood relations as reported by students, which are of easy to moderate difficulty. Questions from all the expected topics like, Deductions, Direction Sense, Number and Letter Series, Analogies, Coding & Decoding etc are given in good numbers. There was no Data Sufficiency question and no question on input/output.
The students have recollected that the combination of questions in this section was as follows.
Logical Reasoning | |
|---|---|
Topic | No. of questions |
Analytical Puzzles | |
Linear Arrangement | 5 |
Distribution | 0 |
Venn Diagram | 3 |
Sub-Total | 8 |
Analytical Reasoning | |
Direction Sense | 6 |
Deductions | 5 |
Blood Relations | 10 |
Coding & Decoding | 5 |
Analogies | 5 |
Number and Letter Series | 5 |
Word Formation Based | 0 |
Calendar & Clocks | 2 |
Odd Man Out | 5 |
Comparison | 5 |
Dictionary based questions | 5 |
Miscellaneous | 14 |
Sub-Total | 67 |
Critical / Verbal Reasoning | |
Assertions and Reasons | 0 |
Statements and Assumptions | 0 |
Sub-Total | |
TOTAL | 75 |
Area 2: Verbal Usage and Reading Comprehension
The section name was Verbal usage & Reading Comprehension. There were two RCs of 5 question each. 8 Questions of Grammar were asked which were moderate in difficulty. As reported by the students all are error spotting questions. 32 questions of Vocabulary were asked (synonym, antonyms, replace the italicized word, Meaning of idioms).
Verbal Usage & Reading Comprehension | |
|---|---|
Topic | No of Questions |
Reading Comprehension | |
Passage 1 | 5 |
Passage 2 | 5 |
Passage 3 | |
Passage 4 | |
Sub Total | 10 |
Grammar | |
Identify the Parts of Speech | 0 |
Error Spotting | 8 |
Sub Total | 8 |
Vocabulary | |
Synonym | 8 |
Antonym | 8 |
Replace the italicized word | 6 |
Meaning of Idiom | 5 |
Filling the blanks | 5 |
Sub Total | 32 |
Total | 50 |
Reading Comprehension:
• 2 passages of 5 questions each were given. Both are short and easy to comprehend.
Vocabulary:
• Questions on Synonym and Antonym 8 each were given.
• Replace the italicized word 6 questions were given> According to the students, 3 of them were easy and 3 moderate.
• Meaning of Idiom 5 questions were asked which had 2 easy, 2 moderate and 1 difficult question.
Grammar:
• Students reported that all 8 questions are on Error spotting.
Area 3: Quantitative Aptitude
Difficulty level of this section ranged from easy to moderate. There were two DI sets. Each set has only one table/graph to study. One set based on Bar Chart and the other on Pie chart. But for one question in each set, all questions required simple calculations.
Quantitative Ability | |
|---|---|
Topic | No. of questions |
Time & Work | 3 |
Time & Distance | 3 |
Mensuration | 0 |
Ages | 2 |
Averages | 3 |
Profit and loss | 3 |
SICI | 2 |
Partnership | 3 |
Allegation | 1 |
Probability | 2 |
Logarithm | 0 |
Geometry | 0 |
Stocks and Shares | 0 |
RPV | 3 |
Remainders | 1 |
Clock | 0 |
Calendar | 0 |
Equations | 3 |
HCF & LCM | 2 |
Simplification | 3 |
Numbers | 2 |
Permutation & Combination | 1 |
Percentage | 3 |
Bar Graph | 5 |
Pie Charts | 5 |
TOTAL | 50 |
Area 4: Abstract Reasoning
There were 25 questions in this section. Level of difficulty was easy to moderate. A few questions were difficult.
Abstract Reasoning (Non-verbal Reasoning) | |
|---|---|
Topic | No. of questions |
Series (next/missing fig.) | 8 |
Analogies | 5 |
Odd man out | 8 |
Miscellaneous | 4 |
TOTAL | 25 |
In conclusion, MAH MBA CET 2025 exam pattern for Day 1, Day 2 and Day 3 saw no changes in the exam pattern. MAH MBA CET 2025 Exam Analysis reveals that paper was lengthy and difficulty level was moderate. Based on question paper, MAHCET Score Vs Percentile estimates are that a Score of 130 marks will get 99%. Check complete MAH MBA CET 2025 Exam Analysis in the above article.